You used an electronic index, a guideline index, and a web search engine to retrieve information relevant to your clinical problem. Compare and contrast your results. Which resources were useful/ not useful for your information retrieval task, and why? Identify some alternative strategies for retrieving relevant information - would context relevant information retrieval be useful?
I obtained different information with each different search engine. PubMed retrieved a huge number of resources on very specific topics, there was a lot of information to look through but once a searched around for a little while I was able to find information that was exactly what I was looking for. The NGC search retrieved so very good information as well, but for my topic is was a little more generalized than I was looking for but it provided a lot of good background and current clinical practice guidelines. The Google search provided some new information that was very relevant to my topic I found HRSA research that may be buried in my PubMed results somewhere, but was easily found using Google, most of the other information retrieved on Google was not quite what I was looking for and wouldn’t hold up to academic standards. Using the variety of search resources increased the amount of information available to choose from and each different resource provided something that the others did not.
